Skip to Content

SCOTUS Once Again Decides Not to Provide Guidance Regarding “More Harm Than Good” Standard Presented in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander

November 12, 2020 Blog

On November 9, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (which, in layman’s terms, is simply a formal request to review a lower court’s ruling) in the case of Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander. At issue were the following: 1. Whether Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer’s “more harm than good” standard can be satisfied by general allegations that the harm of inevitable disclosure of an alleged fraud generally increases over time and, accordingly, plan fiduciaries should have made earlier disclosures through regular securities-law filings; and 2. whether ERISA imposes a duty on a plan fiduciary (who is also a corporate officer) to use inside information for the benefit of plan participants.

So, given SCOTUS’ denial, what does it mean for those seeking clarity on the obligational line between ERISA plan fiduciaries and corporate officials? For now, the “more harm than good” standard holds; however, it would seem that the Court may be open to reconsidering certain aspects of Dudenhoeffer.

Check out our prior Jander v. IBM coverage below:


Supremes Take a (Second) Pass on Resolving Fiduciary Split

Key Supreme Court Cases From the 2019-20 Term and a Look Ahead to the 2020-21 Term

Zamansky LLC Represents ERISA Claimants at the United States Supreme Court

Client Reviews

“Jake Zamasky and his colleagues represented me in a FINRA arbitration case against a large multinational bank and succeeded in obtaining an award for the full amount of my investment losses. I would highly recommend the Zamansky firm for their experience in securities litigation, their level of detailed research and case preparation, and their ability to effectively fight for what’s right.”

Richard R.

“Throughout my entire case, Jake Zamansky was incredibly responsive and spent time walking me through each step of the process. He is professional and worked with my challenging schedule, even meeting with me nights and on weekends. He knew exactly which turn to take when it came to my case and yet was respectful of any decisions I wanted to make resulting in a positive outcome.”

Donald A.

“Jake Zamansky and his firm represented me in a FINRA arbitration case to recover investment losses. Jake and his team were very professional and worked very hard preparing for trial and then reaching a substantial settlement of our case. I would highly recommend them.”

William E.

“Jake Zamansky represented me in a FINRA arbitration case which allowed me to recover a substantial portion of investment losses. He is truly an expert in this space and I would highly recommend him to those investors who may have been been a victim of investment fraud.”

Chris K.

“Jake and his team did a great job communicating with me throughout the process of my lawsuit. I would recommend him to anyone looking to sue UBS for unethical practices.”

Mike A.
View More