News & Commentary

Zamansky & Associates Announces Investigation on Behalf of MF Global Employees

by zamassoc on November 12th, 2011 at 9:45 pm : Comments 000

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Zamansky & Associates has launched an investigation into the collapse and bankruptcy of MF Global, which has resulted in substantial harm to its employees, including job loss and the drop in value of MF Global stock, restricted stock or options awarded or held as a result of participation in an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) or Stock Option Plans.

The firm is investigating claims that may be maintained by MF Global employees, including claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act (WARN) and other state and federal labor laws.

If you were employed by MF Global and wish to discuss your legal rights, please contact Jake Zamansky at (212) 742-1414 or jake@zamansky.com.

Filed under MF Global, MF Global Employees
and

MF Global: Big Bets Are Still the Rage on Wall Street

by zamassoc on November 12th, 2011 at 8:21 pm : Comments 000

Below is a recent article published by Securities Attorney Jake Zamansky on Forbes.com:

The macho, bet-the-house-on-red mentality is alive and well on Wall Street. And that’s despite the disastrous meltdown of 2008, which was caused by massive Wall Street bets on derivatives. Those ill-fated gambles nearly destroyed the global capital markets and have put our economy in a hole that it will take years to dig out of.

If you’re skeptical that the gambling spirit is back with a vengeance, all you have to do is look at Jon Corzine and the wreckage of the firm he ran for little more than a year, MF Global.

Details of the firm’s collapse into bankruptcy are still emerging, but one thing is clear: Mr. Corzine will spend the holidays far away from the casino of Wall Street. Instead, he’ll be huddling with his lawyers in deep discussions about his mismanagement of the bank, his billions in misguided bets on European debt, and the location of $600 million of missing customer funds.

Remember, MF Global was a highly specialized institution. It was designed for a select group of investors, those who used its platform to trade in commodities, futures and derivatives. This is heady stuff, for the smartest guys in the room only.

But that doesn’t make Mr. Corzine-who made his career by betting on Treasuries for Goldman Sachs in the 1990s-a genius. Sure, he was right in the 1990s, and Wall Street guys love to believe that, since they got it right once and got rich, they will get it right always.

A schoolboy could tell Mr. Corzine and his former traders at MF Global that history doesn’t work like that.

For all its pretentions to headiness, MF Global, we believe, failed to perform several of the basic tasks required of securities houses.

First, MF Global broke the cardinal rule in this industry: it failed to segregate customer funds.

Second, it appears that Jon Corzine used the firm’s capital to play his own hunches, placing bets on European bonds and ignoring the advice of other managers and senior executives.

Third, MF Global issued a $25 million bond offering in August and it’s already worthless.

While Mr. Corzine repeatedly said he wanted to build the next Goldman Sachs, this all reminds me more of Lehman Brothers.

This mess could wind up with civil and criminal charges against management, including Mr. Corzine, as well as massive lawsuits brought by the firm’s victims-its shareholders, bondholders and employees.

The management at MF Global was scrambling weeks before its collapse. The balance sheet was eroding as the firm’s Euro debt trades were rapidly moving against them. They were doing whatever they could to prop up firm as long as they could, but it was like using a spoon to bail out a sinking ocean liner. Senior manager and traders will be held accountable.

The Feds have been AWOL with Lehman Brothers and its executives got off scot-free, so there’s a good chance they will take a very different tack with MF Global. Regulators and law enforcement have to take serious steps to restore confidence in the market.

And Mr. Corzine, please, do us all a favor. In the future stay away from making big bets on the markets. Maybe one of his lawyers can get him a game of Yahtzee for an early Christmas present.

Disclosure: Zamansky & Associates are securities lawyers representing customers in arbitrations and state and federal court litigations against their brokerage firms.

Read article by Securities Lawyer Jake Zamansky on Forbes.com

Filed under MF Global
and

CNBC Interview of Jake Zamansky on MF Global Holdings

by zamassoc on November 3rd, 2011 at 5:42 pm : Comments 000

Zamansky & Associates LLC (“Zamansky”) is investigating MF Global Holdings Inc. (“MF Global”) for possible violation of the federal securities laws.

Below is the CNBC video interview of Jacob Zamansky discussing the MF Global Holdings investigation.

Filed under AFW Asset Management, Investment Banking, Jake Zamansky, MF Global, Zamansky Videos
and

TICs Suck Investors Dry

by zamassoc on November 3rd, 2011 at 3:28 pm : Comments 000

Below is a recent article published by Securities Attorney Jake Zamansky on Forbes.com:

Investors: watch out for TICs — no, not the bloodthirsty kind you have to be on guard for after a charming walk in the woods. We’re talking about a strange type of real estate partnership that promises safe, guaranteed returns but can wind up sucking the capital from your retirement account.

It seems that during the gold rush mentality that was the real estate market over the last decade, incompetent or unscrupulous stock brokers sold clients TIC partnerships as a way to defer paying taxes on real estate investments. Problem is, the value on the partnership, which is privately held and completely illiquid, can be extremely volatile and not nearly as safe as promised.

TICs stands for “tenant-in-common” exchanges, and became a phenomenon of sorts about 10 years ago after a change in the tax code. This is how they work: TICs allow the sellers of real estate to roll their proceeds over into other properties without incurring capital gains taxes.

Sounds great, right? As Jason Zweig of the Wall Street Journal on Saturday noted: “TICs were tailor made for a real estate bubble.”

Indeed, investors bought $13 billion of TIC securities from brokers from 2004 to 2008.

One huge problem that brokers sometimes fail to note when selling a TIC is the quality of the real estate the investor is rolling money into. In Mr. Zweig’s column, he tells the story of an elderly couple from Tennessee who sold a local theater for $1.2 million, and then bought two TICs with that money. The offering documents projected an annual yield of 6.5%.

That has not turned out to be the case. The monthly income from the investments has dropped from about $5,000 per month to $300. A big problem has been vacancies at one of the buildings.

Mr. Zweig notes that it’s hardly worth paying a 7% or greater commission to avoid a 15% capital gains tax. Add the troubles of the bloated real estate market, and these TICs are revealed for what they really are: a high-fee, illiquid product pumped out by unscrupulous brokers for investors who are “chasing yield.”

In this case, it’s paying high fees for tax deferral when investors sell real estate that has appreciated. TICs are simply bad news, whether from a walk in the woods, or if a broker tries to sell you one. Buyer beware.

Read article by Securities Lawyer Jake Zamansky on Forbes.com

Filed under TIC, Tenants in Common
and

Lehman Brothers Structured Note Holders Deadline

by zamassoc on November 2nd, 2011 at 12:04 am : Comments 000

Zamansky & Associates Announces Notice of 11/4/11 Deadline for All Lehman Brothers Structured Note Holders

All holders of structured notes issued by the now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., including so-called “100% Principal Protection Notes,” recently received a notice from the committee representing unsecured creditors in the bankruptcy proceeding. The committee recommends that noteholders vote to accept a plan under which they would receive 21¢ on each dollar invested. The committee provides a voting deadline of November 4, 2011.

Many noteholders have questions about this notice. They should be aware that the bankruptcy proceeding should be viewed as separate and apart from any legal claims they may have against the brokerage firm that sold them their Lehman structured notes, including UBS Financial Services, Inc.

If you would like to discuss this notice or legal claims to recover losses that resulted from investing in Lehman structured products, please contact our  Securities law firm at 212-742-1414 or email us jake@zamansky.com.

Filed under Lehman Brothers, UBS
and

“Margin Call” Is For Real!

by zamassoc on October 25th, 2011 at 5:45 pm : Comments 000

Below is a recent article published by Securities Lawyer Jake Zamansky on Forbes.com:

The movie “Margin Call,” which opened this past weekend, advertises that it was inspired by a true story.

The fictional head of a Wall Street firm “John Tuld” (a composite character resembling Merrill Lynch’s John Thain and Lehman Brothers’ Dick Fuld and played by the wonderfully villainous Jeremy Irons) is told that the firm is drowning in toxic mortgage-backed securities. Tuld orders his traders to rid the firm’s balance sheet of the junk by dumping it on unsuspecting counterparties and customers.

Tuld is told: “You’re selling something you know has no value.” He replies: “Be first, be smarter or cheat.”

As the New York Times review of the movie noted: “There are no hissable villains here, no operatic speeches condemning or celebrating greed. Just a bunch of guys, and one woman, Demi Moore, in well tailored clothes and a state of quiet panic trying to save themselves from a global catastrophe of their own making.”

The movie doesn’t inspire fury, as documentaries about the financial crisis do, but “rather a mix of dread, disgust, pity and confusion,” the Times said.

Those powerful emotions inspire gut-churning questions for the audience: Is this how Lehman Brothers crumbled? Is this how Merrill was rescued from ruin by Bank of America? Are these just thinly veiled depictions of Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and JP Morgan, who have paid combined fines of over $1 billion for betting against their clients while selling them these same worthless securities?

Unfortunately for investors, the answer is “yes” to all of the above.

As the Times correctly noted, one of the running jokes in “Margin Call” is that the higher up an executive is on the corporate totem pole, the less likely he is to understand how the firm and its traders cook up the toxic brew of mortgage-backed securities. Their ignorance seems almost a point of pride for the executives. Various lords of Wall Street tell us, “I don’t get any of this stuff,” at key points throughout the film.

That ignorance will be on view again if they make a horrifying sequel. Call it “Bailout,” where the plotline has taxpayers footing the bill to save risk-taking firms that were swirling the drain. And no one—not even Jeremy Irons—goes to jail.

The movie hasn’t even been written, and already I’m filled with dread, disgust, pity and confusion.

Break out the popcorn!

Disclosure: Zamansky & Associates represents investors in arbitration and state and federal court litigation against Citigroup, JP Morgan, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and other financial institutions.

Read article by Securities Lawyer Jake Zamansky on Forbes.com

Filed under Securities Law News

The Dark Side of Solar Energy

by zamassoc on October 25th, 2011 at 4:38 pm : Comments 000

Below is a recent article published by Securities Attorney Jake Zamansky on Forbes.com:

Solar energy was supposed to save our planet and create a flood of “green jobs.”  But sometimes it seems the only “green” in solar energy right now is the $500 million of taxpayer money which went down the drain in the unfolding Solyndra scandal.

Up to now, there’s been mostly hype about the wonder of solar energy.  The market, of course, has paid attention.  Investors have always loved to throw money at new technologies and new ways of doing things.  The opportunity to get there first has always been a siren song to investors, and that irresistible lure can cause trouble.

Just think of the tech wreck of the 1990s and the litany of companies that promised fresh experiences that turned out to be total failures.  We are talking about the likes of Boo.com, pets.com and WorldCom, just to name a few.

Aside from the political angle to the Solyndra story, the weak economics of solar energy were exposed by Solyndra’s inability to make a profit and avoid bankruptcy as the price of solar panels plummeted.

Green political slush is also gumming up the works in a number of states, according to the Wall Street Journal.  In fact, Governor Rick Perry’s $200 million Texas “Emerging Technology Fund” is plagued by the same crony capitalism as Solyndra.  T hat fund acted as a state venture capitalist to more than a hundred firms, including green companies, according to the Journal.

Of course, the United States doesn’t have a monopoly when it comes to lousy solar investments.

Now comes the Jinko Solar securities class action case, which our firm just filed.  The suit shows how a Chinese solar company spewed toxic manufacturing materials into a neighboring river, devastating the environment and leading to riots by affected villagers at the plant.

When the incident was reported in the press, shares of JinkoSolar fell sharply, from $10.02 on September 14 to $5.76 a week later.  JinkoSolar is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of solar products, which use photovoltaic cells to produce energy.  The firm launched an IPO in the United States in 2010, and raised more than $64 million.

The Associated Press reports that there is a “dirty side” to clean energy.  “While use of solar power can reduce the need for burning heavily polluting coal and other fossil fuels, the process of producing photovoltaic cells uses various chemicals and materials that can also be toxic.”

Investors should beware that dirty side of solar energy.  Indeed, solar energy does not appear nearly as bright as we once thought.

Disclosure:  Zamansky & Associates represents JinkoSolar investors in a class action securities fraud suit.

Read article on Forbes.com

Filed under Class Action Lawsuits, JinkoSolar

The American Investor Finally Scores a Win

by zamassoc on October 17th, 2011 at 5:30 pm : Comments 000

Below is a recent article published by Securities Attorney Jake Zamansky on Forbes.com:

The summer was yet another exhausting and painful stretch for investors, with the chaos of the stock market bringing back frightening reminders of the freefall of 2008 and early 2009.

Well, the Dow Jones Industrial Average didn’t shoot up by 500 points on Thursday (in fact, it was down by 41). However, investors may have experienced just a smidgen of relief from the recent high anxiety of Wall Street when a federal judge in Manhattan sentenced former hedge fund titan Raj Rajaratnam to 11 years in jail for insider trading.

Federal prosecutors may be disappointed with the sentence. They wanted more than twice that. Still his sentence is the longest ever for insider trading, and investors should take comfort in that.

Remember, the tentacles of Mr. Rajaratnam’s conspiracy were among the longest in Wall Street’s history, allegedly reaching all the way to the boardroom of storied investment bank Goldman Sachs.

The co-founder of the Galleon Group, Mr. Rajaratnam reached deep into Wall Street’s exclusive enclaves. One of his most powerful allies was allegedly Rajat Gupta, a former director at Goldman who has not been charged with a crime and has denied any wrongdoing.

Indeed, Mr. Rajaratnam’s tentacles wrapped themselves tightly around Wall Street. According to prosecutors, his conspirators and stoolies gave him private, confidential corporate information, and they allegedly included other hedge funds traders, industry consultants and, as we said, corporate directors.

Mr. Rajaratnam, or simply “The Raj” as he became known, was accused by prosecutors of sitting at the center of one of the biggest insider trading schemes ever. Prosecutors went to incredible lengths to nail him and his cronies, using tactics usually reserved for mobsters and drug cartels—such as wiretaps—to build their case.

U.S. District Judge Richard Holwell issued the sentence, which is sending a loud and clear message of deterrence to Wall Street. And we hope the stiff sentence will give investors some comfort that the market can be trusted and is not a rigged game.

“His crimes and the scope of his crimes reflect a virus in our business culture that needs to be eradicated,” Judge Holwell said when he imposed the sentence, according to the Wall Street Journal (subscription required for full story). And The Raj’s crimes did not come cheaply. Judge Holwell also ordered Mr. Rajaratnam to pay a $10 million fine and to forfeit $53.8 million.

Rajaratnam is the highest-profile person to be prosecuted so far as part of a broad U.S. government crackdown, according to the Journal.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Reed Brodsky answered the coward’s call that no one is hurt by insider trading, that insider trading is essentially victimless crime.

“Public companies suffered greatly because their inside information was stolen,” he said during Thursday’s hearing, according to the Journal. Evidence presented at the trial indicated that Rajaratnam illegally profited and avoided losses by trading on inside information concerning blue-chip names such as IBM, Google and Intel. “He is arguably the most egregious insider trader to face sentencing in a courthouse in the U.S.,” Mr. Brodsky said. He called Mr. Rajaratnam the “modern face of insider trading.”

Well said, Mr. Brodsky. Well said, indeed.

Now, after a long hot summer of the stock market’s wild ride, maybe America’s great investing public, that each day strives to save a little bit of their earnings for the kids’ college or their retirement, will rest a little easier with the knowledge that Mr. Rajaratnam and his ilk will spend a long time where they belong: behind bars.

Disclosure: Zamansky & Associates represents investors in arbitrations and state and federal litigation against financial institutions and hedge funds.

Read article on Forbes.com

Filed under Wall Street

JinkoSolar Failed To Disclose Sludge Dumping: Investor

by zamassoc on October 17th, 2011 at 5:15 pm : Comments 000

By Jake Simpson
Law360, New York (October 12, 2011, 7:25 PM ET) — An investor lodged a putative class action in New York on Monday alleging JinkoSolar Holding Co. Ltd. failed to disclose that employees at one of the Chinese energy company’s plants were dumping toxic sludge into a nearby river.

The suit, brought by investor Marco Peters individually and on behalf of all other investors who acquired JinkoSolar American Depository Shares on the New York Stock Exchange, contends that the company made material omissions and misrepresentations to investors concerning its environmental track record.

The plaintiffs’ attorney Jacob Zamansky of Zamansky & Associates LLC said he expects the class will be certified.  “It’s a pretty tight time period and all the class plaintiffs seem similarly situated,” he said. “We’re confident this will be certified and we’re looking forward to proceeding in court.”

After large amounts of fish began dying in the river near the company’s plant in Haining City, China, tests performed on Sept. 17 and 18 confirmed that JinkoSolar had been dumping toxic sludge into the river, the complaint says.

When the incident was reported in Western press outlets, shares of JinkoSolar declined precipitously, falling from $10.02 on Sept. 14 to $5.76 on Sept. 21, according to the complaint.  The following day, JinkoSolar put out a press release in which it admitted it had released unacceptable amounts of toxic waste into the water and had entered into an agreement with local farmers on Sept. 7 to compensate them for crop damage and the death of livestock and other wildlife.

A China-based company that is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of photovoltaic products, JinkoSolar launched an initial public offering in the U.S. on May 13, 2010, raising more than $64 million. In both its prospectus and registration documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, JinkoSolar claimed that its operations were in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, including environmental regulations.

“[These statements were] false when made,” the complaint said. “Unknown to investors at the time, but known now, JinkoSolar’s method of treating its effluent and storing its toxic waste were not compliant with relevant PRC environmental laws.”

A copy of the JKS Class Action Complaint filed in this action can be viewed.

Filed under Class Action Lawsuits, JinkoSolar
and

Investors hit Jinko with Lawsuit after PV Plant Pollution Spill

by zamassoc on October 17th, 2011 at 5:09 pm : Comments 000

A group of US investors has filed a class-action lawsuit against PV manufacturer JinkoSolar following the recent pollution incident at the company’s cell plant in Haining, China.
The lawsuit claims that management misled shareholders and is responsible for losses incurred when its US-listed shares fell in the wake of protests over the chemical spill and subsequent closure of the factory in mid-September.

The suit has been filed by law firms Zamansky & Associates and Sianni & Straite on behalf of Marco Peters and other investors against JinkoSolar Holding and Credit Suisse Securities, which underwrote Jinko’s May 13 initial public offering of shares (IPO) on the New York Stock Exchange.

Jinko’s shares lost 42% of their value in a week in the aftermath of the incident, which saw protestors march on the plant and clash with riot police following fluoride contamination of a local waterway.

Jinko has apologised for the spill – despite not formally accepting responsibility – and made compensation payments to local farmers.

The lawyers cite a Jinko official’s reported comments – “we cannot shirk responsibility for the legal consequences which have come from management slips” – as an admission of responsibility.

The lawsuit alleges that Jinko misled investors by stating in its IPO prospectus and other statutory filings that it was in full compliance with Chinese environmental regulations, when this was not the case. JinkoSolar has not so far commented on the lawsuit.

The Haining plant reopened at the start of this week after a three-week shutdown following the incident. On restarting production, JinkoSolar chairman Li Xiande said: “We understand from this accident that we always need to think about extreme and unforeseen circumstances and generally enhance our risk management practices”.

The company says it has put in place “regulations that are stricter than the industry standard” at the plant and will “apply the lessons learned” across its business.

Ben Backwell, London
Source
Published: Wednesday, October 12 2011

Filed under Class Action Lawsuits, JinkoSolar
and

About Jacob H. Zamansky

Jacob ZamanskyJacob ("Jake") H. Zamansky is one of the country’s foremost authorities on securities arbitration law, the legal recourse for investors claiming broker wrongdoing, or for brokers claiming wrongful termination or other misconduct by their employer. Zamansky & Associates, the New York-based law firm he founded, represents both individuals and institutions in complex securities, hedge fund, and employment arbitrations. more...

Cases We Are Investigating